In the Name of Privacy: What Are the Consequences of Dividing the Internet?

Can putting up walls on the Internet be a good thing? We dissect the idea of "Internet sovereignty" and its uses—and misuses—in a changing world.

In the wake of Edward Snowden’s revelations, the idea of internet sovereignty—“the notion that governments, rather than multinational corporations based in the United States or U.S.-founded agencies like the ICANN… should have control over their own internal cyberspaces”—is gaining traction in countries like Brazil, Germany, and Russia.

Over the past decade, the concept of the untamable internet has dwindled, making government regulation a viable—and debatable—option all over the world. Citing the US National Security Agency’s reach into Facebook, Skype, and other social media, some foreign leaders are calling for fully enclosed, nationalized alternatives to the internet as it exists today. But is internet sovereignty a matter of national security, or a means to police internet activity more easily?

Putin’s Internet

Vladimir Putin, one of the more vocal leaders calling for internet sovereignty, made a splash when he labeled the internet as it exists today a “CIA project.” A few weeks later, the Russian president passed “Bloggers’ Law,” requiring that bloggers with over 3,000 visitors a day register with the government. Registered bloggers will be considered media outlets, and will be held accountable for the veracity of the information they publish.

As veteran journalists, we appreciate the spirit of accountability, especially when more and more people are relying on alternative news sources. Here’s the rub, though. Putin’s critics point out that while he pays lip service to protecting the interests of Russian people, Putin is more concerned with policing their online behavior. In April, Pavel Durov, the 29-year-old founder of Vkontakte, Russia’s popular version of Facebook, fled Russia after refusing to release information about activists in Russia and the Ukraine. It’s a familiar brutishness deployed in the name of security—and smacks of good old-fashioned censorship.

What’s Internet Sovereignty Really About?

So why are some leaders calling for internet sovereignty, really? Look past what their political speechwriters write, and instead at their policies as far as censorship and human rights. As Joshua Keating of Slate points out, “Internet sovereignty might be a little easier to take seriously as a concept if many of the governments that are most enthusiastic about it weren’t so blatantly interested in policing their citizens’ Internet use.” Iran has been calling for a national internet to block unwelcome Western influences for years.

While countries like Brazil may be interested in internet sovereignty for security reasons, others are not. For governments seeking to quell unrest and activism within their borders, it seems internet sovereignty is just another way to control the flow of information, including offensive political content. In the United States, we can count ourselves lucky that, at least for now, the internet will stay neutral.

Gregory Lewis

Gregory Lewis

A winsome wordsmith, Gregory M. Lewis loves nothing better than absorbing new information and crystallizing it into clear, captivating copy. Greg brings his incisive insight and easy-going approach to every project. In his free time, the Chicago native can be spotted at Nets games, art galleries, and local concerts in Brooklyn.

Contact MarketSmiths!

Reach out to learn more and get captivating copywriting.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More from MarketSmiths

b2b marketing

The 15 Best Questions to Jump-start Any B2B Marketing Project

nonprofit marketing

How charity: water Paints a Clear Picture With Nonprofit Marketing Copy


Why Rewriting Your Copywriter’s Content Isn’t Normal—And How to Never Do It Again

Photo: Executium via <a href="">Unsplash</a>

Decrypting Cryptocurrency: Coinbase’s Mission to Increase Financial Freedom

Inc 5000 content agency

M/WBE certified enterprise.

Design by WorstOfAllDesign. Digital Strategy by MadPipe. Photography by Chellise Michael.